19 March 2025
It's difficult to find one or even two or three things to focus on. While the attempted obstruction by judges who have zero constitutional authority but
for some reason get away with gumming up the works was expected and what President Trump's solution will be I have no idea. Personally I and many others
would like to see him tell this judge and the others to pound sand and dare them to hold him in contempt and jail him. They can hold him in contempt easily
enough but making him comply will be impossible. The fact that they are still doing this suggests they are simply out of ideas and don't have the intelligence
to come up with any new ones:
I can't tell you how much I wish Trump would tell that clown he is ignoring him and dare him to do something about it. What's he gonna do - have him arrested?
They tried that for years when he wasn't the president. Just my opinion but if he does that a couple of times - tell them he will ignore any court
except SCOTUS and may not even pay any attention to them. They can do nothing except look ridiculous.
Alex@MyndCryme
I can only assume that President Trump for now is following advice not to do so and he does have the best group any president since Eisenhower. Kennedy didn't
have even a full term to judge him by but certainly no one after him had anything like the present administration. President Reagan seems to have had some good ones
but was hobbled by lawfare even then - President Trump defeated that strategy before he was elected for the second - actually third but technicalities - time. It will
not work this time and where President Reagan was followed by a weak - actually compromised - successor most of his work was undone by him. If President Trump can be
followed by eight or even four years of a President Vance the bulk of the administrative state can be largely dismantled
As
Han Solo said,
that's the real trick isn't it? The only viable weapon the enemy has and is likely to have is destruction of the economy. They are already working
on it, or at least their allies in the "news media" are doing all they can. The problem is that they are so weak and becoming weaker every day. The brains of the
party are either
senile
or
never had much going on upstairs
to begin with. Can they wreck the economy just before the election? In 1992 we had a fake recession because the media was under such tight control and even then
Clinton need Perot and the press covering for him. Carville made his bones there and had a good ride but his time is over. Schoen is over too. Can they do it a couple
of years from now with out a Plandemic or a war? Some are hoping that the president's 'trade war' will cause the economy to crash but that should be over soon and the economy
is already on the way back.
I can't disregard the miraculous return - not just the bullet intended to kill him only succeeded in making him more popular - but the general course of events. It seems
that he is a man of destiny and that
no weapon forged against him
will be effective. I suspect that if that is the case not only will President Trump prevail and leave a President Vance in charge but that the American Renaissance (I prefer
that to Golden Age but am good with both) could span twenty or more years.
As I write this the war in Ukraine seems to be coming to an end. How long it will take is anyone's guess - it seems that the only red line is Ukraine membership in NATO
which is what started it all. OK, the cesspool that Ukraine had become - a center for trafficking in arms, drugs and even human beings. And then there were the US/NATO
biolabs. Putin was sufficiently offended by all that that it took only the threat of a NATO state on the Russian border to start a war and that was what the US/Euro
cabal were hoping for. The only problem is that Donald Trump was elected president and there will not be another Vietnam/Afghanistan in Ukraine.
=============================
We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
-- Ayn Rand
=============================
If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person
were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in
silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be
justified in silencing mankind.
-- John Stuart Mill
=============================
=============================
=============================
=============================
=============================
